To know how to value a company is crucial for the owners want to sell. Especially important is the knowledge about the key drivers that can add value. Not because you are saying to yourself your own rating. There is a lot more value, with a competent, well-known and respected professional to do that for you. Especially if he has made with experience in your industry to the test.
The value of a company may be slightly different from your perspective.Let's say your company has to offer with $ 250,000 in annual cash flow. Let's also assume that you consult a list that describes value as a multiple of annual cash flow from various industries. From this manual you will have noticed that the corresponding multiplier for your industry, 6th
This would firmly in the head determines that the value of your company's 1.5 million U.S. dollars. Now change roles. Take a look at the situation from the perspective of the buyer. You are now a buyer. Youhave examined the same hand and saw the same multiple. But you're as fast as buyers believe that this deal worth $ 1.5 million is? They do not, it can be.
Their refusal to believe it is probably based on the fact that you can replicate lack of confidence in your ability to generate cash flow by the current owner. How much of this cash flow depends on unusual abilities of the current owner? Or, to his personality and charisma? After all, the full price for a pay willPersonality driven business, without an identical personality?
How to value a business, and found a number that will agree with most buyers will depend on the ability to successfully identify the business drivers that will lead to a successful transfer of ownership to. You must identify the necessary proven, effective systems and processes for critical business activities. If you do not have this, you have the choice. Either they develop, implement, or toYou will probably accept a lower valuation, without them.
It was pretty daunting does not it sounded. Let's explore this concept further. Remember at the beginning because the implicit assumption is that different industry multiples based on that performance will improve at the current level, or perhaps further. If you have proven to be effective systems and processes implemented recently, you may be able to argue successfully that a change in ownership and management notaffect performance in any way.
You may also be able to argue that the different would be for your company actually higher than the industry norm. Were your motivations in presenting this argument is that, although the industry standard based on the assumption that the performance will not be harmed by a change in management, is based. They would then suggest that in reality, very few companies that have proven effective systems and processes prevalent than the multiplespropose.
Activities to attract customers and generate revenues, you should have a list of effective systems and processes proven head. And after several of these is much better than with one. This is the biggest concern most buyers. That they are not in a position to equal or better performance of your earnings. Several methods to attract customers and generate revenues that will give buyers some confidence in the reliability of your assessment. And support your argument fora higher rating.
Every business has its own critical evaluation of driver next to customers and revenue. Analyze your own business critical. Determine which activities have the potential to cause the most problems. They are probably also the most expensive, if not make things right. These activities are probably your critical drivers. So, if you do not have effective systems for dealing with them, you need to develop and validate.
Rememberthat the value of these systems and processes is the ability to have in order to prevent you re-invent the wheel before. If you determine an effective means for dealing with a situation where you have to handle it the same way every time it occurs. No time for a creative solution, but not proven. A famous author writing about the U.S. Navy compared it with a system created by a genius, to be run by idiots.
How to value a company is a topic that question and dressed, and givenGiven rise to many experts. In some sectors, there are rules of thumb, such as a multiple of gross revenue, any kind of asset value, and the old real-estate-standard benchmarks. Some experts use the most basic methods. They are projections of future earnings or cash flow, and then turn this off with an appropriate discount factor.
The basic concept was in no way derogatory. In fact, discounting of future inflows is the method with the strongestunderlying theoretical validity. The math is fine. But the weakness that it assumes that the underlying forecasts of future cash inflows is correct. And there may be no good basis for this assumption. Other than that things will continue the trend.